Economía circular: evaluación de combustibles a base de polímeros pláticos en motores aéreos, Universidad EARTH.
Fecha
2019-12
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad EARTH
Resumen
Este proyecto es una evaluación de un combustible a base de polímeros plásticos (Polyfuel), se determina su funcionalidad ambiental, económica y social a través de análisis cuantitativos. En el aspecto ambiental se analizó la opacidad del Polyfuel bajo distintas dosis, y se obtiene una reducción del 39,8 % en el tratamiento con la mezcla al 75 % Polyfuel (TB3) con respecto al tratamiento 100% diésel convencional (TBT). En el ámbito económico se analizó el rendimiento del Polyfuel determinado por los kilogramos transportados por litro de mezcla en una hora de trabajo (kg/L/hora), según el análisis estadístico se determinó que no existen diferencias significativas entre tratamientos, sin embargo, existe un aumento de 41,36 % kg/L/hora al utilizar el tratamiento TA2 (mezcla 50 % Polyfuel) en comparación al tratamiento testigo TAT)(diésel convencional). En el ámbito social se determinó el efecto en la calidad del aire utilizando el Polyfuel, se comprende el tamaño de partículas, la concentración de partículas y concentración de gases. En general se puede concluir que los tratamientos 75 % Polyfuel motor estacionado (TC1) y 75 % Polyfuel motor en movimiento (TC2), generan menos contaminación por material particulado (mg/m3) emitido, en comparación con los tratamientos 100 % diésel convencional estacionado (TCT1) y 100 % diésel convencional en movimiento (TCT2). En medición de gases se concluye que el CO en el tratamiento 75 % Polyfuel (TC1) presenta un 19,05 % menos concentración (ppm) con respecto al tratamiento 100 % diésel convencional (TCT1, testigo). En el caso del tratamiento 100% diésel convencional (TCT2, testigo), presenta una disminución de un 75 % en la concentración de CO (ppm), con respecto al tratamiento 75 % Polyfuel (TC2). En el caso del CO2 el tratamiento 75 % Polyfuel estacionado (TC1) presenta un 52,24 % menos concentración (ppm) con respecto al tratamiento 100 % diésel estacionado (TCT1). El tratamiento al 75 % Polyfuel en movimiento (TC2), presenta una disminución de un 82,5 % en la concentración de CO2 (ppm), con respecto al tratamiento 100 % diésel convencional (TCT2), para el caso del H2S y CH4, todos los tratamientos presentaron un 0 absoluto.
This project is an evaluation of a fuel based on plastic polymers (Polyfuel), its environmental, economic and social functionality is determined through quantitative analysis. In the environmental aspect, the opacity of Polyfuel was analyzed under different doses, and a 39.8 % reduction in the treatment with the 75 % Polyfuel mixture (TB3) with respect to the conventional 100 % diesel treatment (TBT) was obtained. In the economic field, the Polyfuel performance determined by the kilograms transported per liter of mixture in one working hour (kg / L / hour) was analyzed, according to the statistical analysis it was determined that there are no significant differences between treatments, however, there is an increase of 41.36% kg / L / hour when using the TA2 treatment (50% Polyfuel mixture) compared to the TAT control treatment) (conventional diesel). In the social sphere, the effect on air quality was determined using Polyfuel, including particle size, particle concentration and gas concentration. In general, it can be concluded that 75 % Polyfuel idling engine (TC1) and 75 % Polyfuel engine in motion (TC2) treatments generate less contamination by emitted particulate matter (mg / m3) emitted, compared to conventional 100 % diesel idling treatments (TCT1) and 100 % conventional diesel in motion (TCT2). In gas measurement, it is concluded that the CO in the 75 % Polyfuel treatment (TC1) has a 19.05% lower concentration (ppm) with respect to the conventional 100 % diesel treatment (TCT1, control). In the case of the conventional 100% diesel treatment (TCT2, control), it presents a 75% decrease in the concentration of CO (ppm), compared to the 75 % Polyfuel treatment (TC2). In the case of CO2, the 75 % Polyfuel stationed treatment (TC1) has 52.24 % less concentration (ppm) with respect to the 100 % diesel idling treatment (TCT1). The 75 % Polyfuel treatment in motion (TC2), presents a 82.5 % decrease in CO2 concentration (ppm), compared to the conventional 100 % diesel treatment (TCT2), in the case of H2S and CH4, All treatments had an absolute 0.
This project is an evaluation of a fuel based on plastic polymers (Polyfuel), its environmental, economic and social functionality is determined through quantitative analysis. In the environmental aspect, the opacity of Polyfuel was analyzed under different doses, and a 39.8 % reduction in the treatment with the 75 % Polyfuel mixture (TB3) with respect to the conventional 100 % diesel treatment (TBT) was obtained. In the economic field, the Polyfuel performance determined by the kilograms transported per liter of mixture in one working hour (kg / L / hour) was analyzed, according to the statistical analysis it was determined that there are no significant differences between treatments, however, there is an increase of 41.36% kg / L / hour when using the TA2 treatment (50% Polyfuel mixture) compared to the TAT control treatment) (conventional diesel). In the social sphere, the effect on air quality was determined using Polyfuel, including particle size, particle concentration and gas concentration. In general, it can be concluded that 75 % Polyfuel idling engine (TC1) and 75 % Polyfuel engine in motion (TC2) treatments generate less contamination by emitted particulate matter (mg / m3) emitted, compared to conventional 100 % diesel idling treatments (TCT1) and 100 % conventional diesel in motion (TCT2). In gas measurement, it is concluded that the CO in the 75 % Polyfuel treatment (TC1) has a 19.05% lower concentration (ppm) with respect to the conventional 100 % diesel treatment (TCT1, control). In the case of the conventional 100% diesel treatment (TCT2, control), it presents a 75% decrease in the concentration of CO (ppm), compared to the 75 % Polyfuel treatment (TC2). In the case of CO2, the 75 % Polyfuel stationed treatment (TC1) has 52.24 % less concentration (ppm) with respect to the 100 % diesel idling treatment (TCT1). The 75 % Polyfuel treatment in motion (TC2), presents a 82.5 % decrease in CO2 concentration (ppm), compared to the conventional 100 % diesel treatment (TCT2), in the case of H2S and CH4, All treatments had an absolute 0.
Descripción
Palabras clave
COMBUSTIBLES, PIROLISIS, POLIMEROS, MOTORES, ANALISIS ECONOMICO